[Guest post] International Monetary Fund (IMF)


I am back with a new post on the role of the International Monetary Fund in the New World Order.

To those who are new here, this aim of these posts is to create an awareness on the New World Order.
You can check out the first and second article on this subject.

Here is an interesting extract :

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has been described as one of the enforcers of globalization. Nations who receive IMF assistance are often forced to surrender more sovereignty and further open up their borders to international banks and multinational corporations. Much of their wealth is then sucked dry by foreign predators with its resources and population essentially becoming the collateral for such financial aid.  As a result of the global economic crisis, many more nations are having to turn to the IMF for help.  [Ref1 : Read more here]

G20 & IMF?

At the recent G-20 Summit in London, the IMF’s role was expanded and its powers enhanced. There was little mention of its failed policies and its less then stellar record of effectively promoting development and democracy around the world. While some talk of reform, the IMF continues to rape the world, one poor nation at a time. [Ref1 : Read more here]

This “super sizing” of the IMF, as it has become popularly known in globalist circles, falls under the rubric of “global governance stimulus,” a term being used to describe the transfer of powers from nation-states to institutions that are part of the United Nations system.

If the IMF is empowered with global monetary and financial regulatory powers, along with the ability to issue a global currency and bonds, it will no longer have to ask its member states for funding. Nor will the UN.[Ref 2 : thenewamerican.com]

And now, if you are further interested in this New World Order, don’t hesitate to watch the documentary of Alex Jones on youtube.

24 thoughts on “[Guest post] International Monetary Fund (IMF)

Add yours

  1. ils paraissent intéressants tes articles sur le sujet!
    c’est ce que j’étudie en cours d’économie internationale, d’ailleurs jdois regardé une longue interview de Stiglitz le prix nobel en économie, et il parle justement du IMF et tout et tout, d’ailleurs ça pourrait ptète t’intéresser alors jte passe le lien : http://www.challenges.fr/video/
    la vidéo est en anglais, puis vu que c’est long (6h) tu peux choisir les chapitres et sous sections qui t’interesse!
    jte laisserai des com’ plus tard, là j’ai des tas de trucs à préparer pour les cours 😦
    bisouxxx yashhhh


  2. Extract from the Telegraph newspaper:

    “A single clause in Point 19 of the communiqué issued by the G20 leaders amounts to revolution in the global financial order.
    “We have agreed to support a general SDR allocation which will inject $250bn (£170bn) into the world economy and increase global liquidity,” it said. SDRs are Special Drawing Rights, a synthetic paper currency issued by the International Monetary Fund that has lain dormant for half a century.
    In effect, the G20 leaders have activated the IMF’s power to create money and begin global “quantitative easing”. In doing so, they are putting a de facto world currency into play. It is outside the control of any sovereign body. Conspiracy theorists will love it.”

    Please click on the following link to wach a video whereby the presenter, David Icke, gives an entertaining but real description of the financial system :


  3. We should be thinking more on how to improve democracy and eradicate the gaps that make it vulnerable to other power systems, and most importantly, how NOT to be slaves to money.


  4. The Maverick, I think I have argued enough in one of your previous posts as I don’t think there can be a repressive regime with 200 people at the top trying to control the whole world, with all sharing the same desire to control everything but at the same time, they wouldn’t seek more power because, even if they are power-thristy now, they wouldn’t mind once the NWO is in place because apparently, then, they would not mind ruling alongside other people.

    Furthermore, the world goes through a lot of stages, society changes immensely throughout history, the next step in humankind evolution is globalisation and it seems like you are trying to give it an evil twist by throwing out random pieces of information and blog posts by fellow conspiracy theorists. As it stands, you can’t even prove anything apart from speculating that the Bilderberg group is actually evil. You just assumed that because their meetings are behind closed doors. The whole conspiracy has been based on assumptions since 1776 and blostered by random events around the world, such that the methods to be used for this world domination you are talking about has been modified throughout the ages.

    Another thing about the Bilderberg group is that its attendance changes every year. Some people come back every year, but a lot don’t. Tony Blair has attended it in the past and it seems like he’s not anymore. So, if he had access to all the evil discussions which go on in those conferences, and he is no more part of it, then what does he stand to gain from hiding all the evil ‘facts’? Please don’t again assume that somehow they have managed to seal his mouth along with hundreds of other participants who don’t attend all the time.

    I wanted to write more, but I am at work right now. But to finish, just wanted to add that it’s not wise to stick to only one side of the coin. Logically speaking, you should try to explore why NWO can’t happen as well. And it’s not like there are no grounds for that!

    Anyway, I expect you to answer my question by referring me to some random statement by George Bush or answering my question/comment with another question like ‘why did the Earth look so big in space if the American indeed landed on the Moon’, or ‘if Armstrong was first to land on the moon then who was filming him when he was getting down’ you know what I mean…


  5. Yashi –


    The whole process is what we call a “totalitarian tip toe”.
    How naive of you say that the “next step of human evolution is globalisation”!!

    Please give us an insight of how GLOBALISATION is going to help us in the process of evolution????

    It is going to drive humanity into more poverty and misery. A world where big private companies rule, where people starve to death because they do not have enough DIGITS in their bank account.



  6. Yashi –

    One more thing, i never mentioned any ramdom “Bushism” . Your concept of evolution really baffles me.

    You asked me to look at the other side of the coin, i did. It’s disgusting, it’s against human values, it is an insult to man kind.

    I did look at the other side of the coin, unlike you. Typical “sheeple” mindset…



    That is exactly where some people could be wrong, trying to connect dots without them being actually linked to each other is not clever nor logical. This is what is typical of the blind faith into conspiracy theories displayed by certain people. Maybe not you, you seem pretty calm, some other people really take it seriously and it’s even weirder that these all powerful organisations have done nothing to neutralise these dot-joining people. And if these conspiracy theories are indeed true, then it proves another point: that humans will NEVER go down without a fight, it coulc take decades or centuries, but it’s human nature to battle diversity just like it’s human nature to desire power.

    “How naive of you say that the “next step of human evolution is globalisation”!!”

    I did not mean natural evolution, as in we would evolve into some sort of super being. The way the society is structured and with the advancement of technology and sharing of knowledge, it is inevitably leading towards a ‘smaller’ world. I was not as naive as you to ask how this would HELP evolution, I did not say it would totally help social evolution, it has pros and cons. But unfortunately, some people see the downsides only and are more prone to thinking out dark scenarios rather than sit down and analyse it thoroughly.

    An interesting thing is that people usually think conspiracies are bullshit, which normally means, they think they are not likely to happen, or if they are being planned, they won’t come to fruition, as in they do not completely dismiss it, while conspiracy theorists are like religiously dogmatic people, they think it’s absolutely going to happen and nothing can stop anything. I think I know which category I want to be in.


  8. I was clearly kidding about the Bush thing, I thought you got that, Anyway, what I really meant was that you (along with many other people who support this theory blindly) tend to answer my direct questions or comments by random pieces of information instead of going into the matter and explaining it to everyone.

    By other side of the coin, I meant the one where there is no NWO… If you think it’s disgusting, then this discussion is over… As for myself, I have looked at the possiblity of NWO and why it could happen. It could happen because we are humans and we tend to end up divided into classes, with higher classes garnering more and more power with the ultimate aim of controlling everything and everyone,eg, the Ancient Romans, the Persians, Alexander The Great,…etc, all of whom failed for one simple reason, humans are hard to control, you could control most but there is ultimately someone out there who will rebel. Control of most things are certainly in the hands of a few people at the moment (people who keep changin by the way, power is not constant), so theoretically speaking there could be a NWO in the pipeline, my argument is that is it feasible? I personally don’t think so.

    Wow great, ‘sheeple,, your personal attack has certainly settled this debate, you HAVE to be right now. Cheers. I expected a better sharing of ideas… I am a sheeple, I wn’t ask questions, I will just accept what you say, that’s what sheeples are, isnt it?


  9. Yes you are right when you say mankind will not give up easily BUT this a war on your mind! There will not be any popular uprising!! This is not going to happen. As long as the threat is invisible, intangible, faceless, no one will rise up. Rise up against what? This is a psychological warfare. A prisoner will feel imprisoned when he sees the bars around him, he will fight, he will struggle, this is human nature. But if you cannot see the physical threat, you will not feel the need to fight.

    Our freedom is being eroded day by day without us doing or saying anything.

    Even our mobile phones nowadays can be remotely activated to make calls without you knowing.

    Intelligent braking systems are being introduced to “slow” down speeding motorists by the use of GPS. Have you thought how this can be used to control us?

    CCTVs are being extensively used in the developed world to watch the population.

    Youtube has shut down the INFOWARRIORS(infowars.com) channel without any reason

    Our DNA is being mapped into centralised DATA banks

    there are so many examples i can offer.

    The world has indeed become smaller but this not an excuse for multinatinal companies to dominate our freedom?

    What’s next? people being microchipped? Depopulation? Will you need a license to have children?

    Open you eyes, wake up, CHOOSE THE RED PILL (as Morpheus from Matrix 1 said…)


  10. Even our mobile phones nowadays can be remotely activated to make calls without you knowing. This is already in use legally in the USA whereby you can shut down your mobile phone but the police or CIA can remotely activate it to make a call back and listen to what you are saying


  11. Yashi-

    If you say you were only joking, i humbly present my sincere apologies to you. I hope you accept it. I must say, it is great fun arguing with you 😉

    By the way, click on the link below on the latest news on the Bilderberg meeting 2209


    By the way, you might be interested to know that the U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner will be attending this year’s meeting. This is clearly against the Logan Act (detailed below)

    Text of the Logan Act

    § 953. Private correspondence with foreign governments.
    Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
    This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply himself, or his agent, to any foreign government, or the agents thereof, for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects.
    1 Stat. 613, January 30, 1799, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 953 (2004).

    As you must know by now, both clintons, the Bushes and Obama have attended the meeting and if the Logan act would be applied, they would have been prosecuted

    You mentioned that the attendees are not the same each year? Here is one example:

    Robert Zoellick was previously a managing director of Goldman Sachs, United States Deputy Secretary of State, and U.S. Trade Representative. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission and attended Bilderberg meetings in 1991, 2003, 2006 and 2007

    Another respectable newspaper reporting on the meeting and explains how their reported is being hounded….

    People who still doubts those articles, google Bilderberg and NWO

    Why dont you also google OPERATION RED SKY? you will be surprised…



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: